| Young's profilemuddy pinky 嗟尔君子, 无恒安处. ...PhotosBlogLists |  Tools  Help |
次贷之下，可有完卵？the devil Credit Default Swap in the global financial crisis刚好昨晚看到亚视在播《60分钟时事杂志》，谈到此次金融危机。因为跟城中大热《珠光宝气》时间相冲的缘故，高堂大人毫无意外娴熟地取过遥控器，玉指轻按，boo~ Alan Greenspan 失意的老脸立刻变成黎姿20年不变无辜的笑颜。而我，只有挥一挥衣袖，带走一肚子疑问。。。 有生之年，只记有1998年的金融风暴，虽然说周边普遍鸡毛鸭血，可还是有人欢笑，像Soros之流。还有HK政府，在股市捍卫战中不仅力保不失，还赚了几十billion, hedge funds怏怏而回。而中国政府，据记忆 (10年前的事情，记不大清楚了)，也是“成功地击退了”这些基金黑巫。不管之后数年的市道低迷是否藉此触发，当时那一刻，是有人赚有人赔 －－我简单的小脑袋中比较能理解的守恒定律，钱怎么可能凭空消失呢 ？除非开始就没有过－可是大家确确实实腰袋鼓了，出手阔了。 而这次，据说，全军尽墨，买少亏少，买多亏多，来一百少一百，来一千少一千，来30年外汇储备照样吃下，外加几百billion US$ 的分摊。 所有人都哭了，黑洞的那头，没有地球人！南柯一梦醒，直接见上帝： 头几个，上帝兴致还好，不仅心存惋惜，想到世事无常，人生苦短，都邀敲窗的来访者，一醉方休，甚至琢磨着如何把这些故事写入Nova Testament作为警世恒言。陆续地，普通民众也多了起来。上帝失去 了耐心，他们渐渐没有当初的某(投) 行 (金融)业 从业员那么受待见了。这时，一个名人站了上台：” 同志们，这些是三十年河东三十年河西，事物发展的必然结果。看你们，上半辈子大都锦衣玉食，常言道：有几 耐风流有几耐折堕..." 一石激起千层浪，河东河西的愤怒的民众，联合各大媒体，把他弹劾得引咎下台。 （此时，台下，甚喧哗： 跑题了！跑题了！NND ，你废话什么呢。呼～ 看砖！◎＃￥×◎！～＃◎...某人，从mess里匍匐而出，继续开讲) 话分两头，各表一枝。。。上回说到60 minutes,提到Credit Default Swap 是罪魁祸首，而Alan Greenspan被认为是在2000年打开了Pandora‘s Box ＋Bill Clinton的溺爱纵容，终于，在伟大的2008，等来了次 贷危机。
那么这些CDS保险合同是如何把投行套牢的呢？ 为什么纸醉金迷过后，不仅赌徒，连庄家都输的裤穿洞？
以下，将由Google + 分子遗传的专业人士为您一一解答。欢迎金融业内人士补充指教。 阿房宫是谁烧的？
先有鸡还是先有蛋？The Vitality of Spontaneous and Paralleled Exploration on Humanity and Philosophy Reflection on Politics and Society Following Each Advance in Sci & Tech
A chicken was just an egg's way of making another egg --- Samuel Butler (1835-1902)
Darwin's Renaissances since 19th century; Sigmund Freud's Rise and fall since the turning of 20th C, and the ultimate abandon of psychoanalysis from the main stream of the community; H. Driesch's turning to vitalist after incapability to explain the complexity of the epigenetic harmony. Newton's surrender to theology
Every progress in the evolution of science was thoroughly examined and traced. Usually they were accredited or at least compared to plato, Aristotle 's philosophies. I am not familiar with the western philo system but is amazed by the liberation and creativity of each speculations made before its validation
Free your mind, then backup with resources. You do your thing, we’ll do ours. 我们说师夷强技 说了一百多年 严格地执行过，执行中，趋势是还将执行下去
师，或鉴 夷 哲学思想 是否更治标 回到百家争鸣的时代 首先保证知识的共享 盯着虚无缥缈的“核心技术”吵嚷着要对等开放解密
受众更广，体现精髓的收藏，成果或者数据库 为什么不主动获取 比如说project MUSE, JSTOR 不要说没人查阅浪费资源 首先要确定availability, accessibility 才谈applicability, utility
提供选择 应该是选择性吸收的前提吧
了解每个现象和理论后面的人文和社会根源 难道不会帮助我们了解其局限性和可行性
学院派在中国现实社会的可行性？是否真的世事洞明皆学问人情练达即文章？
别人说是。
是事实以及事实之全部？
是为无上境最近看一篇小说。 里面的一个女孩蛮小就历炼无数。听她把很多常人看来惊世骇俗的个人境遇波澜不惊地娓娓道来，就像人前展开一幅白描的清明上河图，所有过往的繁花似锦都淡化作记忆中旁观者的黑白剪影。其中提到她曾经出家跟随师父云游的一节，说在西部的礼佛之都里一间药铺伙计，见到她们都停下手中其他生意先照顾她们。因而师父跟她说，他人此举是敬重她们出家人。出家人便不能"take it for granted"（大意，原文忘记）. 要明白这种俗世中的便利是“业”。 更要勤加修炼以消业。其后不久，疼爱她的二师父在另外一个寺庙挂单时托一个居士带给她获赠的两件羊毛衫，因她尚未正式剃度。虽然不鼓励但尚可以华衣美服。
由此可见僧侣都是克己异常。尚未得道的更要处处小心。 一切使皮囊得到舒适的行为都要避免。 甚至要反其道行之。唯恐一不小心被引诱的打回原型再堕凡嚣。另一例证就是作者提到做早课并不是为修行而是为抗拒惰性使艰苦修行成为习惯，至少less panicing.
这种时时刻刻战战兢兢的规范心态我不知道是否有助于他们变得心明澄净。 或许从“时常勤拂拭，莫使惹尘埃” 到 “本来无一物，何处惹尘埃” 是质变而不是量，需要独辟蹊径。 在我这种俗人看来，时间或许是淡化感官恰意和残余记忆的良药而非使我回复白纸的解药。对尘世美好的 记忆余渍任凭如何努力如何擦掉？ 更何况，这并不是受了谁的旖惑，乃是实实在在的天生就会定义的身心愉悦。 那遁入空门是否因为不能言喻的极惨遭遇，以致在槛内人心中痛苦总是和所谓俗世欢乐如影随形？伤痛盖过了所有的美好，任何微末的尘世中的言行总是带来痛楚，有所权衡之后还是不碰为上。或许，容我妄言，遭遇突然导致思觉失调，既然感受不到也无所谓。
最近重温matrix I and II. 忽然想到一个先有鸡还是鸡蛋的问题： 先有人类对喜怒哀乐的感知，对物质的欣赏， 以致被利用为抚顺的工具， 还是，这只是作为程序的一部分被编进我们的天性里面来丰富我们的生活？就好像前年动物试验之后人类现在（良心发现？？）开始提出animal ethic.
觉得matrix 好像颇有点说禅的意味。 暗示我们返朴归真。 摒弃对物质的追求，因为这些快乐痴迷都是镜花水月。是脑电波和neurotransmiters 制造的虚像。就如大块T-bone loin 或者迷人红衣女郎． zion 里面的战士为理想战斗.所幸他们还有能为之奋战的追求.其实一旦得到了自主又如何呢？如果爱慕依恋物质情感是我们的天性, 当没有一致外敌时我们是否将要终身跟自己的本性交战? 那前人奋斗, 战胜自己的惰性, 邪恶的诱惑和外在的恶劣环境, 可以是因为还有更高的追求：无论是人类共和,物质更高文明的所谓理想. 当这一切都被反对,被解释为虚幻,那么我们是否都成了可悲的矛盾体,存在就是自我不断的反省规直至涅磐,出生之日起,path = destiny. 当我们都必须无欲无求，或许大家都认同了追求七情六欲可耻的道德准则．幻想一下，此时天下大同．
－－放任自我视为不道，为他人奋斗无此需要，建设社会就是浪费材料。。．自有识始，就应该静心修为直至得道或许进入下一轮回．周而复始．那么．．先不顾虑种族无从繁衍将可能灭绝的问题．除非可以彻底删除我残存的对外界的感知．然，我可不可以弱弱的申诉一声．．．请许我灰飞烟灭．－－－ 可持续发展，
是为无上境
香港不应该是文化沙漠人们一向这样看华南
我想当然把香港扯下水
当然是我的短视
民主社会 人性化 也不禁欲 任由发展
人民都无可厚非地有肉欲享乐上的追求
甚至成为伪主流 -- 声色犬马 更客观或主观上 引人注目
要逃避现实 有的是无边的奢侈糜烂
要反思现状 也有不尽的资源 思潮 暗涌 可供发掘
况且少受教条的荼毒
你有压力 我有压力 可以纸醉金迷 可以学巴士阿叔怒骂街头 可以到城市论坛一抒己见 可以在自己blog上大放阙词
任君选择
妈妈说 亚马逊要变沙漠了 知道么
哈哈 这不 逼得能人逸士 逃离山林 ：p 纷纷现世
隐于市-----自得其乐 还 如鱼得水
让我这等星斗小民
惊艳--膜拜
ReadingsDespite this, Epicurus says that there are gods, but these gods are quite different from the popular conception of gods. We have a conception of the gods, says Epicurus, as supremely blessed and happy beings. Troubling oneself about the miseries of the world, or trying to administer the world, would be inconsistent with a life of tranquility, says Epicurus, so the gods have no concern for us. In fact, they are unaware of our existence, and live eternally in the intermundia, the space between the cosmoi. For Epicurus, the gods function mainly as ethical ideals, whose lives we can strive to emulate, but whose wrath we need not fear high heelssubject of research with more fun
i saw a documentary on TV about high heels. Some fun facets i wanna share:
when talking with women on flats, men tended to lean back and forth and interact actively into the conversation;when talking with the group of the same actractiveness (faces, body, dress..), men tended to lean back, appreciate and be convinced. A galance how the sex appeal turns into real power.
So negotiation held by a round table is necessary isnt it? It obviously saves men from that deadly distraction thus ensures fairness to both sides (i mean the ppl behind both sides, for the negotiator, losing a battle for an icecream cant be phased as "unfair"..:P)
Manolo Blahlik:
enthusiastic designer, looks kinda gay, elder. but admirable for his passion on beauty and talents. Got his design inspirations everywhere from daily lives. The designs look bold, wild but yet chic and playful. He dares use all kinds of elements, look contradicted separately but integrate well together.
I also like his attitude towards celebrities, afterall, he said it makes his shoes for everyone (well, I advocate the quote by not looking at the price tags); Also amazed by his managing gaining such fame without any advertisement ---酒香不怕巷子深。。
Jimmy Choo:
I heard he's the malaysian guy who made shoes for Elisabeth II. Famous for his excellent craftmanship and beautiful designs. I was atonished when noting that there's actually a design team backing the company and he's only responsible for the manufacturing part. His image kinda vanished, for me af least, creativity is what makes human unique, not the perfection on techniques, esp. in this era where almost any tools is available. Of course qualities and stabilities are important, and it's what makes Jimmy superior, but depends how much you wish to spend, and wut kind of comfortness is demanded. Needless to say the effort from a 3rd world labour spending a minute besides the sewing machine oughts to be something much worse than the reputated Jimmy production...
His commercials are seen everywhere too. I guess he's more of a sucessful business man. He also embraces his celebrity fans too.
Pactric Cox:
A Canadian, skinny middle-age designer. I used to percieve him as a handbag and accesories - designer but i learned that his expertee is literally on shoes:P London based business. He said his design is funky chic. From the few images seen on TV, his design seems sensative, detail emphasizing and fragile, just like his personal image. Thus he makes beautiful ballet sandals whose ribbons wrap around and showcase perfect legs but definitely expose imperfections..I guess they are not for housewives or career oriented women. Gd for those who make the photoshoot for his shoes:D
菲冷翠 legend of Italy
" the industry is there. The techniques are handed down over generations. You cant go to college to learn how to make shoes"
Ferragamo
brought along with his shoes case, extraordinary designs to his adventure to the States. Popular for decades. remember that famous marilyn Monroe in a white flying dress in the 7yr-itch?? SHe's on a pair of ferragamo heels. Imagine she's on a pair of flat/converse/...eventhough the famous lanvin ballet flat:P
my choice??
what makes you think i would sacrifice my super-comfi flat sandals? Always remember, for women, say is one thing, do is another..hahaha. when giving me this kinda pretty/comfi challenge, plz 1st make sure i could sit for all day long....
无数磨合，凑成我七零八落的人生回首逝去光阴
如题
与人为善
不是懦弱的借口
如同水清无鱼
不能为孤僻冷漠辩护
若墨守成规是不能挣脱的桎梏/ 至少应提高斗志行动力
a program to drop your inspirations of notesa composition program to drop your daily inspiration. whenever that comes,
the evaluated version of music publisher 6
now availbale
it's fun, and a place where u could find all the symbols and notes, that u have familiarized long, but never got the chance to know their exact names,
but it takes a while to get use to it, obviously it is unlike words that we 've been using for a while so it's faster than handwriting
check it out. a scotish product, a race that's known for her enthusiam and passion for music
have fun
待改进我的思想
诘责， 自以为站在不同的角度看到别人不见的山花烂漫，
却不明了大部分时候
根本连助纣为虐的资格都不具备；
习惯旁观， 片言只语地评论，
是因为我写不出思维连贯文法平和的篇章；
告诉自己喜欢言简意赅， 谓之引经据典也不至于太坏，
实质囫囵吞枣，懒得细心揣摩， 闪个大概，
以只可意会不能言传为藉口，希望别人补足所谓的尽在不言中
皆因力有不逮，穷思竭虑却只能略窥门道，
为了不自暴其短，遗漏的精粹全数略去
不能将感受具体化，我其实是真的拙于言辞
看到很华丽的词句
很生动的比喻
很形象的表达
很幽默的词句
很艳羡， 真的
今天看到《〈青蛇〉〉的台词， （张曼玉的老戏了吧，没看过）
里面青蛇白蛇的比喻，直抄了张爱玲的红玫瑰与白玫瑰的经典譬喻
-朱砂痣饭沾子月光蚊子血-的那一段
编剧不值得赞扬，
诚然不是第一个吃螃蟹，
起码临摹出彩，
精彩的文字我读了也不过是水过鸭背，
成片采拮，注明出处
不是留余地给人品味
而是名正言顺地拒绝费神思量
所以一直艳羡艳羡艳羡没有长进，僵化生锈
不是不悲哀的
归根结底
懒就一个字~~~~~~~~~~~~ 食品安全曼陀罗vs 鹤顶红
基因改造物vs 苏丹红 中国vs 加拿大 当面临用10颗子弹射进脑袋或者接受一管爱滋病毒注射（的选择）时， 我象大多数人会选择后者，谁知道呢，说不定我们对后者免疫力---安省财长如是说，面对美国和渥太华双重压力下被迫接受两国软木材纠纷协议的时候 我不关心加拿大政治， 上文是在地理作业剪报材料中读到的。 出于三句不离本行的奴性， 软木材上的纠纷在我思想上没有任何引申的机会。三分钟前在搜狐上读到近期苏丹红鸭蛋的报道倒是被我和加拿大地理联系起来了（好，我承认在我谷歌论文相关题材的同时浏览中国的娱乐八卦---对，我八挂）。加拿大幅员辽阔（言下之意：荒无人烟）， 紧邻经济强国（同理：经济从属，竞争力“薄弱”，如果有的话）。美国是世界工厂，而且内需巨大。 加拿大在资金，规模， 技术，工艺上都毫无优势（非同档次个体不具可比性）退而求其次，充当原料供应地无疑是短期内的明智选择---经济可持续发展性不在讨论范围内---半个世纪以后的事谁关心啊， 该下台的下台到任的到任退休的退休政变的政变。
“美国是以私有制经济为主体的资本主义国家”，商人们最想什么：赚钱（当然我们老百姓也想， 可是我们买彩票买证券，商人卖彩票买政权，档次上有一定差距）。 怎么赚？ 1，提高单件商品利润； 2，扩大销售数额。怎样提高利润？买贵点，或者降低成本。怎样扩大销售数额？1，提高市场占有率； 2， 提高总需求（这个难啊， 又不是非典的时候买口罩）。所以呢。。。（总之，学经学商的自己分析分析，俺就不掺合了）。。。反正想赚钱的人想方设法降低成本。 有些无良商人就加些工业染料苏丹红使我们的鸭蛋看起来红些（以前也有过鳗鱼绿奶粉石油月饼诸如此类），所谓色香味；
----------先不说道德上的谴责， 不要跟商人谈道德----------- 在商言商， 这种是杀鸡取卵缺乏效率在缺少资本和其他必要条件下短视行为， 而美国商人， 在几十亿美研究经费投下去务求 “一切皆有可能” 的推动下， 有了举世瞩目的创意和成果（鼓掌！ 烟花！） --我们可以在极地上种出麦子了， 因为鱼的耐寒基因移到麦子上--- --我们种出不怕病毒的烟草了，因为细菌的抗病毒基因移到烟草上---
--我们养出几天就成熟上市的鸡，不就是几针类固醇激素24小时灯光无间断喂食终生禁锢就解决的小事儿嘛---
--我们还发扬废物利来用节约成本羊脑喂牛, 人参茯苓猪是法拉利的买卖可是本田的生意更好赚---
理直气壮的美其名曰， 这只是古人做法的延伸，祖宗们不都会选种杂交嫁接嘛-千里马驹长大都比缜马跑得快，挂绿就一课不接到桂味上雷劈死了怎么办？---水稻跟谁到果树根果树可以理解。马跟驴也算了，而且骡还不能跟骡。可是古人不至于疯狂至为了养出飞马真的把鹰跟马杂一起，就算是也有心无力。没有人知道打开潘多拉的盒子有什么后果，我们总自以为是。 切尔诺贝尔的自动毁灭装置最终也赶不及派上用场。 一段经过无数次验证的修补基因，一个深思熟虑的载体，看似无懈可击的再结合段设计，成熟的技术，当你把它真的放到人体上，放到基因库里，你永远不能预料到有什么可怕的结果（详情参阅《自然〉02年头条，关于严重综合免疫缺陷基因疗法失败的头条）讽刺的是， 人们总是面临两难的选择， 免疫缺陷还是白血病？ 10年还是15年？
哎呀，你想太多了吧。 这小麦到了肠子里连糊糊都不是了。嗯唔（加上食指扫过60度，拇指中指掂下眼镜双眼平视轻轻瞄一眼再往下看---电影“穿帕达的女魔头”阿曼达的经典动作， 啊，爱死梅利尔的演技）。永远不要低估你的敌人---肠子不是锡纸，胃酸不是硫酸，变质酶不是所向披靡！！ 而且谁说基因污染一定要吃进去？皮肤呢？呼吸道呢？只要那么一小段奇怪的东西进入你的细胞，就不是控制范围内的事了。 谁知道鱼的基因到了麦子里会不会稳定下来，没准跟超级敏感元什么神经毒药相似转几个核糖体就行了？自然界几万年做的事，几年加速过来其他周围事物却没有时间适应怎么看怎么别扭。
还有羊脑呢， 羊脑那个不是基因，蛋白质， 一个可以把我们脑袋变成海绵（状）的蛋白（不要笑， 这不是比喻，疯牛症就是这么样的，牛牛为什么疯， 脑袋都装海绵了能不疯吗？）
基因改造了的麦子，亩产上万斤。
羊脑牛骨髓喂牛，便宜。 加拿大的选择是：种，养， 卖美国市场，经济短期内保证无恙； 种其他，其他养，卖其他市场（欧盟日本不欢迎改造的，也不欢迎加拿大牛），经济崩溃。所以呢？爱滋针吧， 基因改造吧。 白人不是1/100有爱滋抗入侵的能力吗（他们的t细胞缺少某种使病毒进入的接受体蛋白）
呃， 对了。 我在南京第一次吃小龙虾，05年，被其鲜味惊艳。 后来偶然看到小龙虾是怎么养的，还是05年， 就再没有吃了。
不记得什么时候第一次吃龙虾。中国的龙虾希望就不要这么大老远的从加拿大进口了。 反正听说加拿大最甜的龙虾在纽芬兰，哈里法斯。好像是跟小龙虾的鲜美的原因差不多。你知道，哈里法斯是一个小城，没有什么污水处理，就只有直接排出海岸了。魁北克， 人多，也穷，不靠海， 污水也只能从哈里法斯出海。 龙虾是近海岸养殖的。加拿大龙虾好像在价格上也还有竞争力。 （可能说的不对，不准， 将就着看，懒得查字典） 近来食物安全挺热的，我也侃侃：）
ONE further discussion of GODAs stated in the blog, I did not buy the skateboard model either. Anyone who could foresee the disasters and has the ability to stop it from happening altogehter should prevent it, if he's sensible. Especially in the cases where thousands of lifes were wiped out all at once, and who are full of sins lost their life, as well as those who have none...That's why I said if god loves human like my father loves me, he couldnot have done all of these throughout human history. Yup I also think of the following alternatives that might explain,
1. He has a different ideology or value system or logic that is not easily percievable or appreciated by the minds he created.In that case bible is the best he could do to try to disect a little of the values but left a lot of warnings in human language. By validating the assumption, and since no one could tell what god's thinkning and wut he really values since he who with unlimited power couldnot even explain, how dare we? So, wut we think are unfair since punishment was unexpected on the good ppl doesnot excist. Those who have less guilt might not be less guilt, in god's standard, although he meant so, in our intepretation, from the bible. Kinda similar to your "not a nice guy" explanation. Aloof observer. I find his not lending-a-hand behavior an excuse, he doesnt think wut we consider goodmen are worth helping. 2. Bubble model, that's a descent one. Wut an excuse and reality~ He creats the world,but has no ability to modify, things simply go beyond control. Sounds like a tragety of nuclear power plant leakage or those sci fic describing talented scientists creat some undesired moster mutants~~ Hmm. in that case i prefer one to responsibly tell the truth, not to cover up and ask for faith. You may argue that even if we know there's no one who could make a final judgement, and disasters still occur, we still couldnt change anything. Wut's even worse is that ppl will fall in desparation cuz we lost our final reserve. Without the believe, the distruction of the world may accelerate. Well, all i am arguing is he shouldnt have manipulated our believes. Give us advices and instructions. Let us choose. There are possibilities that ppl would not listen to rationals or reasonings, or they didnt care for others. In that case religions, believes of god was useful. By appearing authoratative or unquestionable, those who were made believed might hesitate to do the crime or even think of it. Is religion a mentality tool per se, so that when we are looking at ppl we hated so much cuz of the harm they do but still living well, we could tell ourselves, judgement is awaiting:)
It's logical and easier to accept that he's not unlimited, otherwise, is he indifferent with binladen in attacking the pantagon killing the CIA/FBI staffs and other innocents. ~~
The logic is perfect, just it reminds again how we are vulnerable, I prefer the chinese way of explaining it, fate."different paths lead to the same destiny殊途同归" There's another logical trap. If life is pre-set, even if u try hard in order not to regret later on, the result will not change. But if you dont, you somehow know that without effort there's never a chance of success. Or life is preset in a way such that even the struggling of making a decision, the dilemma, and the decision that finally comes up, are pre-set. Hmm. so when we are trapped in a fog where prediction is not feasible, making effort seems a better choice of minimizing uncomfort at the time. And, making ourselves faithful, seems to help making decision quicker or affirming our choice. By accepting god is not limited, we find a mental shelter where to avoid the ironic truths of our incapacities, the chaos, conflicts,..So is this why it's forbidden/offended to discuss topic with the faithful cuz they know where the answer lies in their hearts, surfacing the question is just like sticking a tiny needle into their most colorful bubble...
split mind据说有12星座。 我能数的上的有天蝎，天平， 射手，人马（圣斗士看得多的结果， 我花了多少心血收集黄金战士盔甲贴纸啊）
有一天, 猜某人星座， 说了n个都说不是。 “跟动物有关“ “山羊？” “还有另外一个” “河马” “·#￥%……” “是牧羊" "kao, 母羊，还公羊呢” “·￥#**-_—……” 脑袋都乱了
a tester, screen for a cells, mating to alpha, so the alpha cell lawns on plate a mating tester, screen for alpha, mating to a, so the a cell lawn on plate a factor tester,screen for secretion of a factor, so screen for a cells, arrested by alpha factor, so alpha factor plated....................... Dr Spence 是queer吗？ 点解次次见距都系着樽领冷衫？态度超温文尔雅。况且，距左手无戴戒指。 ..."你有没有听过一首童谣？里面说，星期一出生的孩子，相貌很不错。星期二出生的孩子，充满喜乐。星期三出生的孩子，有较多的忧伤。星期四出生的孩子，要离开自己出生的地方很远。星期五出生的孩子，懂得爱和付出。星期六出生的孩子，要很努力的谋生。星期天出生的孩子，正直而有智慧，善良又快乐。"
他笑了："那我不是星期天出生便是星期一出生的了。" "真的吗？"她朝他笑了笑。 "那你是星期几出生的？" "星期四--" "星期四，星期四是--"他一时间记不起所有的歌词。 她重复一遍："星期四出生的孩子，要离开自己出生的地方很远。" 谁说兔子要吃胡萝卜？兔子和胡萝卜好像密不可分。 就像猫要吃鱼一样天经地义。 兔子吃胡萝卜的意象固然美妙，则二者的关系必然乎？？
1。 生存？
会吗？据理说只要有充足的成长必需的营养成分（怎么好象婴幼儿奶粉广告~~）， 满足其身体发育的需求就够了。好比人， 不吃馒头可以吃面包，不喝牛奶可以喝豆浆， 要不光吃维他命+蛋白粉一时三刻也无大碍。当然这有味道好坏的区别，也有个人喜好，囊中充裕与否的问题。鱼翅捞饭谁管得着啊？所以这不在讨论范围内。我们假设兔子这个特殊的族群是匀贫富， 绝大部分个体成员偏爱胡萝卜。 因此兔子可以爱萝卜， 可是萝卜不是身体能量的唯一来源。 要是这样的话澳洲也不会兔患成灾，宠物店里面也不会有猫粮。
2。就近可取性？
野生的胡萝卜？兔子祖先生存了这么久，其起始可以追溯到nM年前。。。根先有鸡还是先有鸡蛋不同； 也不是说一定先有光合植物才有植食动物。 这总的来说是这样子，第一个植物肯定是出现在这个吃的家伙之前。 可是我们讨论单个个体， 兔子，萝卜， 就不能这样套。 这往下发展，衍生衍生着， 有什么先来后到可言~~某个物种可能雷劈死了，有些可能捡了好运在风凉水冷的地方不思进取， 有些被暴晒两下变异了~~扯远了~~ 好，胡萝卜是农作物--〉人来耕--- 所以人之前， 谁种给野兔子吃？ 好好的野草到处是。。。哪个兔子这么耐心挖人参似的找那一两个野萝卜？不活了？
兔子打地洞？
好好，就算野萝卜成片成片的长得欢， 非的引诱兔子去吃。。。可是兔子也得晓得挖才行。 猪都会挖truffle， 那兔子还不会挖萝卜？注意：请不要假设兔子比猪聪明。就算是，萝卜比truffle好吃？ 值得放着大好野草不吃， 每顿折腾？
对于住在集中营的兔子，喂给胡萝卜， 代替难闻单一的饲料，是恩典还是我们自以为是的恩典？操纵得太久太顺心。 人。。。
That you do not prove its existence does not prove its non-existence I've discussed the God's existence question with a Christian friend. Not that I was a geek, became philosophical or had too much time in hand, I was just curious: the Catholics and the Christians have been denounced that how we human are beloved by God. If GOD lexist, why do God allow (approve should i say) sufferings? While there sufferings brought us tremedous pain and seemed endless, how could one still expect human to 'have faith' under the circumstances? , (ironically, that's the definition of faith, isnt it?)
She did not provide me an answer, unfortunately. She told me that she became faithful since something happened to her that made her believe those were far too belivable to be classfied simply as "coincidence" or "luck". She did suggest me to go to churge with her, address the questions to the priest and see if he could provide a satisfying answer., or at least, a convincing one.
I was reluctant to go, as one who knows me well shall imagine, not that I was too pride or had an prejuidice against this religion. I did wish I could have the luck to get the answers from a regional church priest. what my past experience told me otherwise. I consider myself as somehow open minded: if something that could talk a billion ppl to believe or at least paritially believe in it, especially that there are some promonent members with extrordinary minds in that group, that thing MUST have something that is worthing noting. I have had visited the church several times, each accomanied by some Christian friend. The first time was about some miracle sharing meeting (i dont know if i got the terms right, anyways, it was about this sort of things), and it felt like a direct sale gethering (i meant no offense, that was how i felt at that moment). The others, well, sole plays of some ordinates: neither eyeball capturing or exciting, i know, they are not supposed to, David Letterman's late night show you assuemed eh? then, please, at least somehow brighten up my dull mind or be sacred. No, even worst of all, the priest voted some morally unacceptable (only by me?) examples to promote the "faith".
Pretty disappointing.
Days ago i read the "angels and demons" by Dan Brown. THe author, in order to write a profitable novel to keep his living (never a low end one , plainly) I assumed, would have put some effort in investigating the topic of religions, otherwise how could he provide such resourceful facets about the subject yet unfamiliar and facinated by most of us? In his story, a swiss guard asked the camerlengo (the pope's servant) exactly what I was wondering all the time, the "wise" man (in the portait of this book) answer this was the chance GOD allow us to learn. He is always able to, prevent anything bad from happening, but only from these events human learns, and grow. He explained by providing an analog: a father who allows his son to skateboard even though he foresees there will be danger and pain.
Well, I dont know if Brown had privately discussed such an issue with anyone in authority of this matter, (may he have a tea party with the camerlengo in the Holyland, as claimed:) , digged out the answer from literature (of course in novels we expect no systematic citations or reference) or just somehow figured it out. At a first glance it sounded convincing for me. Right, he loves us like our father, he sure will allow us to learn from pain "no pain, no gain"....But wait...why do we have to have pain in the first place? where are they from? Greed? Jealous?
Let's assume they are the origins, that is to say, the bad temperaments rooted in human nature. I know we are never prefect, never close to. So cant he erase such dark side from human nature that everyone becomes saint then there would be no arguments, disputes, battles, war...
Well, if you say, we ought to equit with these characters, in order to survice on this land, because of our limited resources and growing population. Again the point, cant he make the earth heavenly without desserts, drought, flood thus no subsequent famines, plagues..
one may just say human wouldnever satisfied with what they've already had, but do we even have the chance to have whatever we want? Please, throughout our history, at least provide us one such chance to allow us to show our potentials.
No. never the chance. Just like many of the elders (or adults when we were children), as we know they are capable, he did not quite lend his hand or interfere with what we were doing, even if we consulted, he presented us a set of cold rules: here are what u need to obey. If we refuse, then, well, "dont say that I didnt warn you the consequence ahead. Now you are responsible for what you've done". He observed, aloofly.
Let me tell you what my dad would do, if the consequence is as terrible as many of the sufferings occuring daily on this planet. Of course he would warn me, as you can imagine. if i insist, "what my daughter trying to do is devastating for her"--he would do everything to prevent this from happening, yes, by all means. Obviously the outcome maynot be always good, not close to what it intended to be or completely opposite (a famous example is committing suiside after a couple of lovers are violently separated), parents are often being criticized, so are we-- overprotection leads to loss of immunity.
Be aware, man. None of us are omnipotent. Unlike the one who is supposed to assert his authority, his guidence , his savery, Jeasus@$%*&!
I fall in a logic trap of circular argument???Fine. Let me come back to the title. Phew~~~Wait a sec, let me clear up my mind...
Ok, we know these biotechnology stuff, some princibles, some fundations. We have some observations. We can have some manipulations, simulations, thus creations. Before we thought there is only one who could do this, now we know some secrets, then what?
Behave!
you know some, so what?
We were children, we watched our dad built a house, drove a car, did some impossible things. Now we grew up, we can somehow do this, but this does not prove/side prove anything about the abilities. This is simply how everyone does it. If everyone does, there might be some advantage of adopting the particular method, say, easiest, most convenient..etc.
Let me put it this way: we know how cells replicate. we somehow also know how to let them replicate. This maybe carefully designed, (by god, in this argument), or just exists as it is. When he invented (creat, i should say) so many things, he certainly need some tools to maintain effecient management to prevent chaos. Imagine each type of cells on earth replicate in a different fashion! Thus, he, or mother nature, or whoever, adoptted a set of rules, to govern something, make them have some automaticities. By incidence (or not), we discovered the rules. We were amazed. Playing around, we could somehow acheive to confidently use it to make some toys nowadays. So do we. What does this imply? Nothing. We could continue to focus on the new toys. But this does not serve as a piece of evidence of rejecting creatism.
Natural selection can also be one of the rules, cant it?
Please note, i am not a proponent of either. Either is possible. A debate forever.
However we are somehow clear that what we have is ourselves. He is powerful, if exists, and will not generously assert it. Or even worse, he maybe the one who administers punishment, if things are out of control, by default.
Nonetheless it is a trick to persuade some people to stop "sin"(do less harm) if they believe in it. Religion is Powerful in this sense.(Likewise, for non-religious there are laws and orders, morals, norms, peer pressures...etc)
--MY --
in wonderland 最近最近，没有时间（借口），没有心情咬文嚼字地写博。 其实我也从来没有这个耐性。 看到别人的博文， 觉得还是有必要记录一下历程~~ 不管如何当时的instant感悟is a unique interation b/t all the factors...u wouldnever have the chance to re-experience.
上网潜水， 看到有篇文章讲起宝钗的"教育成长背景“。里面提到原文好像是冷自兴说宝钗她爸爸去世， 用的是“爷”。那个人大放阙辞， 说什么宝钗可能是薛姨妈跟她公公的女儿~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 这么另类的提法。 绝倒。这原来红楼里免除了秦可卿， 还有薛姨妈陪着爬灰。
这人还有没有常识阿~~~ 别的不说， 就我这白丁都知道木兰辞里面，爸爸都是称的爷。 果然， lz后面被人猛拍砖, 都提到木兰辞。
conclusion: 中学语文抓得不错
undermine: sample biased
开学了，再听sigma factor, RNA pol, 恍如隔世。 further make up my mind never to deal with the radioactive labled DNA, Ab, again.
however, tomorrow i am doing PCR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FINALLY
又要离开本来一直挺期待去北京小住的日子，阔别十年， 听得原本以3环为城郊分界的皇城已扩张至8环外~~期望能再驻足于故宫花园细赏鹅卵石砌的图案，矗长城之上眺望河山，再撑下几个十三陵外的巨型水蜜桃。。。北京留给我的记忆，是繁华凝重无忧无虑。历史对这座古城的洗礼，辉煌也罢， 残酷也罢，重生也罢，于我，不过徒增饭后谈资。
突然发觉明天就是出发的日子。才惊觉回广州已经差不多两个月了。习惯了这里喧闹闷热的气息--久违了--如此亲切。很多人问：回来，还习惯吗？ 习惯？！！ 我生于斯，长于斯， 18年，没有离开连续超过十天，怎么不习惯？家，能不习惯吗？？（小庆幸一下：偶正当青年，免疫系统正常运作，T/B/NK cells记忆良好, 见到广州所有的antigen/pathogen老朋友还熟悉， 不至于像某些归侨因“过敏”落泪流涕离开20年回家2天就“无法忍受”落荒而逃~~）
也算是没有耐性喜新厌旧的一个人。住久了一处会觉得闷，喜欢旅游，探险，总之出去玩就对了。。这几次回家，也向往游玩带来的新鲜刺激增闻长识。 有机会，总迫不及待地马不停蹄辗转于路途中。 偶然静下来 ， 却发现在家的宁静安逸更难能可贵。 离家太久，以为自己早已适应，或者根本就是designated for漂泊--也不然。在家的时候，旅游是点缀， 游学久了， 回家成了奢侈。
不管如何，明天又要离开。 为任何缥缈的目标。或者堂皇的理由。不要慨叹人生有太多无奈，我们都明了孰轻孰重并已取舍。
就算舍不得水浸街，也该去会一会沙尘暴了。 条例好吓人！！！！！！！ 不过也就是能吓吓我们。。。
一、不得利用本站危害国家安全、泄露国家秘密，不得侵犯国家社会集体的和公民的合法权益，不得利用本站制作、复制和传播下列信息： （一）煽动抗拒、破坏宪法和法律、行政法规实施的； （二）煽动颠覆国家政权，推翻社会主义制度的； （三）煽动分裂国家、破坏国家统一的； （四）煽动民族仇恨、民族歧视，破坏民族团结的； （五）捏造或者歪曲事实，散布谣言，扰乱社会秩序的； （六）宣扬封建迷信、淫秽、色情、赌博、暴力、凶杀、恐怖、教唆犯罪的； （七）公然侮辱他人或者捏造事实诽谤他人的，或者进行其他恶意攻击的； （八）损害国家机关信誉的； （九）其他违反宪法和法律行政法规的； （十）进行商业广告行为的。 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
